Lockheed Martin Chief Speaks Out against Sequestration

AIN Defense Perspective » June 29, 2012
Lockheed Martin CEO Bob Stevens said government spending cuts threatened by sequestration will force the company to modify its contracts with suppliers, leading to untold consequences. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)
Lockheed Martin CEO Bob Stevens said government spending cuts threatened by sequestration will force the company to modify its contracts with suppliers, leading to untold consequences. (Photo: Lockheed Martin)
June 29, 2012, 12:00 PM

Contracts with suppliers would have to be modified with untold cost consequences, if automatic U.S. government budget reductions through sequestration become a reality in January, according to Lockheed Martin chairman and CEO Bob Stevens. That could affect anywhere up to 40,000 suppliers in the case of Lockheed Martin, a $46 billion civil, government and defense contractor.

In a speech in Arlington, Va., on June 19, Stevens echoed increasingly urgent warnings delivered by the Aerospace Industries Association and other aerospace and defense industry executives, including Boeing Defense and Security president and CEO Dennis Muilenberg, about the damage that would result from sequestration, a congressionally mandated reduction of $1.2 trillion in government spending over the next decade. Half of that amount would come from the defense budget, which is already being reduced by $487 billion over 10 years, compared with previously planned levels. Action by the U.S. Congress to avert sequestration is not expected until after the November presidential election.

Stevens said Lockheed Martin anticipates about a 10-percent across-the-board reduction in government spending due to sequestration. But the company does not have enough information to advise its concerned suppliers how this will affect contracts. “When we have a modification of our contracts, we’re going to reschedule up to 40,000 suppliers,” he said. “My sense is those suppliers will say, ‘That’s a business disruption, and we’re going to claim the adverse cost of the disruption from you.’ We’ll be compelled to pass that along as the prime contractor to our government customer.”

Lockheed Martin has been preparing for reduced U.S. defense spending for some time. The company has eliminated 1.5 million sq ft of facilities space in the last few years, and plans to remove another 2.9 million sq ft by the end of 2014, Stevens said. The workforce of 123,000 employees is 18-percent smaller than it was three years ago “and the pace of our hiring has slowed considerably,” he said.

In 2010, Lockheed Martin said it would close its Mission Systems and Sensors facility in Eagan, Minn., by 2013. Christopher Kubasik, who will succeed Stevens as CEO in January, said further consolidation is taking place in Fort Worth, Texas, and in Montgomery County, Md., home to the company’s Bethesda headquarters. If sequestration were to occur, “There would be additive numbers to that and locations yet to be identified,” Kubasik said.

Share this...

Comments

No Avatar
Larry Walters
on July 2, 2012 - 7:47am

Defense spending is spending on US Jobs!

During the lows of 2009 and 2010, Lockheed was hiring hundreds of laid off workers from Wichita, Columbus GA,, Charleston SC., and even some from a start up manufacturer in Albuquerque NM. They were also hiring entire graduating classes from technical colleges like Middle Georgia College, some from Redstone and Spartan, which provided advanced training for manufacturing jobs. These colleges were in turn hiring instructors and administration to meet the need from this defense contractor. Planning and preparations for sequestration has already had an impact on current and now previous employees, of Lockheed and these technical colleges. This fear of sequestration has had an impact on more than jobs, specifically a little boy named Andy, who attends my daughter’s elementary school. Andy does not know if he gets to start 1st grade back at the same school he attended kindergarten or has to move again while daddy looks for another job.

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X