Congressman introduces bill to ground MU-2 fleet

NBAA Convention News » 2006
November 6, 2006, 8:18 AM

Despite the issuance by the FAA of a Special FAR (SFAR) mandating initial and recurrent training for MU-2 pilots, lawmakers still want the airplane grounded because of its poor safety record.

Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) has introduced a bill (H.R. 6058) in the House of Representatives that would force the FAA to ground the MU-2 “until the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration certifies that the aircraft is safe and the certification is approved by law.”

The MU-2’s first FAA type certificate was granted on Nov. 4, 1965. Since then, the FAA has conducted two special certification reviews of the airplane (1983-84 and 1996-97) and a safety evaluation (December 2005).

The recent SFAR requirement is a result of last year’s safety evaluation and actually exceeds Tancredo’s request that the FAA impose a type-rating requirement on the MU-2. While a type rating would require a higher level of initial training for MU-2 pilots, it would not include recurrent training. The SFAR calls for mandatory initial, recurrent, requalification and differences training.

Tancredo’s bill, cosponsored by Rep. Michael Furguson (R-N.J.), has been referred to the subcommittee on aviation, the first step in the legislative process.

The FAA’s SFAR might be a result of pressure from U.S. Congressional representatives who have been urging the FAA to do something about what they say is the MU-2’s high accident rate. For many years, Mitsubishi has formally asked the FAA for an MU-2 type rating, with no success.

In the SFAR, the FAA notes that a type rating does not include a requirement for recurrent training. The SFAR’s requirements are therefore more stringent than a type rating and include initial, requalification, differences and recurrent training for specific minimum hours instead of training to proficiency, which is a type-rating feature.

The SFAR would take effect on March 27 next year and apply to any pilot flying as an MU-2 instructor, pilot-in-command or sole manipulator of the controls. Unless they have received initial/transition, requalification, recurrent and/or differences training in accordance with Mitsubishi’s formal training program part number YET 05301 (issued in July 2005), pilots will not be allowed to fly an MU-2 in the U.S. The recurrent training requirement is specific: pilots must train annually on the special emphasis items and training course final phase check items.

The rule is fairly strict for MU-2 instructors, who must have logged 2,000 hours total time, 800 as PIC in multi-engine airplanes and 300 PIC in the MU-2, with 50 hours in MU-2s in the past 12 months. Designated pilot examiners and check airmen must have 100 hours in type and meet the SFAR training and currency requirements.

To maintain landing currency, MU-2 pilots have to do their landings every 90 days in an MU-2, not just any multi-engine airplane. The same goes for biennial flight reviews, which must be done in the MU-2. Instrument currency, however, is not MU-2-specific.

The SFAR also includes new operating requirements, such as no single-pilot IFR or night VFR without an operating autopilot. Pilots must also make sure the current flight manual and FAA-approved Mitsubishi checklist is available and accessible during flight.

Share this...

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X