Babbitt Pushes NextGen Equipage  

NBAA Convention News » 2011
FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt
FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt says convincing operators to equip their aircraft for NextGen is a big issue, which is one of the reasons why the NextGen Advisory Committee has a lot of industry representation on it, including NBAA and AOPA.
October 8, 2011, 5:20 PM

FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt says convincing operators to equip their aircraft for NextGen is a big issue, which is one of the reasons why the NextGen Advisory Committee has a lot of industry representation on it, including NBAA and AOPA.

“I think there is a business case for it,” the former airline pilot and labor leader told AIN in a telephone interview just days before the NBAA convention. “Remember that when we go in 2020, when everybody is required to have ADS-B OUT, that’s clearly an obligation and one whose cost, I believe, will come down dramatically as the units come into mass production.”

The other aspect of mandatory equipage is that operators can get rid of other navigational equipment onboard as they transition to GPS-based navigation, and as ADS-B is used for surveillance.

“You improve situational awareness, and I think in the long run you are going to save money,” he said. “We are on a very high-profile path to make certain that we’ve got approaches where people–not just from the metroplex areas, but from lots of small airports–are getting GPS-type approaches so that they can do LPVs. These will give them lateral and vertical guidance to an airport, improving safety and, in some cases, provide access to an airport that otherwise would have no approach facility.”

One of the reasons the NextGen Advisory Committee was formed is to make certain that the path the FAA is pursuing for NextGen is what the industry wants. There are options and there is a flow order to consider.

“We elected to put ADS-B into the Gulf [of Mexico] for a good reason,” Babbitt said. “It’s a huge return. Operators there move 10,000 people a day in and out of rigs in the Gulf. The number of people  moved there every day is phenomenal and the amount of traffic there is so much safer.

“We knew we would get a big return on our investment. You can talk to the helicopter folk [about] their fuel savings, their time savings and their ability to go direct now instead of through the grids. It’s been a wonderful cooperation and partnership between the industry on the civil side and the federal government. What’s next? Help us put the things in place that the industry will use more quickly and get benefit from quickly.”

Continuous Descent Approaches

Another component of NextGen is continuous descent approaches, and AIN asked whether these approaches are airport specific, airplane specific or a combination.

“They are sort of a layering combination,” Babbitt said. “As a generic name I would call them continuous descent profile; optimized profile descent. There’s a variation called tailored arrival, but let’s just call it optimized profile descents. Yes, they are airport specific because you need a procedure.” Again, following the path of where there will be the biggest return, Atlanta was a natural, he said, and the FAA also got a great deal of experience in Seattle because of its high volume of traffic.

“You need an airport that has, or will need, some type of standard instrument arrival–a STAR,” Babbitt said. “So you take the STAR and add to it the optimized profile. In order to do a true optimized profile, on the third leg of this little journey you’ve got to have an airplane that understands how to manage its own energy. You’ve got to have an airplane that has vertical descent capabilities in the autopilot. So you say to the autopilot: I want to arrive at such-and-such a fix eight miles from the airport; I want to arrive at that at 3,000 feet and I want to be going 200 knots–and you program it. And you say, by the way, pull the throttles back at the last possible moment. That’s the optimized profile. Down it comes. It’ll follow that profile, throttles go to idle. It’s energy management. You want to stay up high as long as possible.”

FAA Reauthorization

Asked about the long-delayed FAA reauthorization, Babbitt said he wants to focus Congress on the need for a multi-year bill. “The shutdown put a big bright light on it when we went without an extension and had to furlough 4,000 employees and do the other things that we had to,” he said. “That had a long-lasting, negative impact. It was expensive and there were consequences. And now we have that debate. Many people understand there are negative consequences to not funding for a long period of time–a four- or five-year reauthorization.”

As case in point, Babbitt said, any new project the FAA would start now would have only four months of funding that the agency knows about. “That could be taken away from us,” he explained. “So who’s going to start a two-year project, or design a two- or five-year project, or a 10-year plan for runway renewals across the country? Who’s going to start a project like that when they have only two, three or four month’s worth of money. If you did, it could be stopped and you would have wasted all that money.”

FILED UNDER: 
Share this...

Comments

No Avatar
Richard Wyeroski
on October 10, 2011 - 10:16am

Is next/gen real? Let's see!?, it will be required by 2020 and literally by that time, all the government management involved will be retired and living in Florida on their pensions, including Mr Babbitt.

My personal opinion of next/Gen as it sits now is, that it is, all smoke and mirrors and will cost the taxpayers "BILLIONS" with no clear return for the money.

Many of us in the aviation industry know the real problems with congestion in the metro areas are simply not enough airports, runways and airspace for the flow of traffic.

David Grizzle the new ATO manager says that "controllers using next/gen, will be able to bring in aircraft must closer together then they do now".

The FAA is not really sure if the US system will work and be compatible with the European System and the rest of the world!.

One would thing we would all get together and work out the problems before committing all this money into a new navigation system.

Richard Wyeroski, former FAA inspector
FAA Whistleblowers Alliance member

No Avatar
Gabe Bruno
on October 11, 2011 - 12:29am

The NextGen project has become a multi-billion dollar morass of cash cow government contracts and Babbitt knows it. When former FAA Associate Administrator, Nick Sabatini has been named as a "partner" with CSSI Inc, a major NextGen contractor, something is seriously wrong.

Sabatini was caught giving misleading testimony to Congress in 2008 and subsequently retired. While at the FAA, every major program Sabatini oversaw was a failure. Check the DOT/IG reports on ATOS as an example. DOT/IG, are you paying attention to your oversight responsibilities for contracting fraud, waste and abuse?

Gabe Bruno, Retired FAA Manager
Executive Director, FAA Whistleblowers Alliance

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X