AIN Blog: Looks Like the Gig Might Be Up for Regional Airlines

AINonline
Pilot sleeping
The FAA hopes its new rules government flight and duty times will help reduce pilot fatigue. (Photo: Monika Wisniewska - Fotolia.com)
January 17, 2012 - 1:05pm

It took quite a while, but the FAA finally did the right thing—to a point—when it announced that it would give passenger-carrying airlines two years to institute new flight/duty time rules that set new, stricter rest period requirements and flight-time limits. Of course, it punted when the air cargo lobby insisted the cost would prove prohibitive to the likes of FedEx and UPS, doing nothing but encouraging those carriers to voluntarily adopt the new rules.

But for the nation’s regional airlines, which already face a potentially crippling new law aimed at increasing pilot hiring minimums as much as six-fold, to 1,500 hours, the latest FAA rule on flight and duty time limits appears more worrisome than some in the industry might care to admit.

To his credit, newly elected Regional Airline Association chairman and president of American Eagle Dan Garton actually sounded an alarm about how the new minimum hiring requirements and the new flight time, duty and rest rule will exacerbate an expected pilot shortage in the association’s newsletter, Regional Horizons. The refreshingly candid commentary finally contained an acknowledgement that the regional airline industry faces some real trouble, not only as a result of changing demographics and a “faltering global economy,” but also because of stricter regulations.

The fact remains that regional airlines face “challenges” from a number of sources, including their own mainline partners. Now managing barely positive profit margins, the majors have not only finally addressed their overcapacity issues, they’ve driven much harder bargains with their regional airline partners, depressing yields among the RAA’s member airlines to levels not seen since fee-per-departure agreements came into fashion. Meanwhile, the 50-seat jets that still dominate many of the regional fleets cannot make money as fuel prices stubbornly hover just below $130 a barrel. 

Now, the regionals face the likelihood of far higher pilot costs driven largely by the new rules. Prospective pilots simply won’t invest the time and money needed to compile 1,500 hours for the meager $18,000 salary that regional airlines have become accustomed to paying new-hire first officers. That, along with the fact that the airlines will need to maintain larger crew staffs to compensate for the longer rest periods mandated by the new regulation, could finally end the practice of regional airlines acting as a sort of training ground for their mainline counterparts.

For its position on the new duty-time rule, the RAA referred AIN to a somewhat noncommittal written statement crafted carefully for public consumption:

The Regional Airline Association recognizes a science-based rule on pilot flight and duty time will advance guidelines for airlines, and RAA is reviewing the comprehensive final flight and duty time rule released today by FAA.

“The cornerstone of our efforts continues to be safety.  This final rule is a culmination of considerable effort by FAA, pilots and airlines, which began with the Aviation Rulemaking Committee established in July 2009 and with RAA and airline member participation,” said RAA president Roger Cohen.  “While we are still reviewing the rule, it does open the door for additional research, including our own efforts on a ground-breaking fatigue study of multi-segment operations by Washington State University.” With its continued dedication for safe, professional and reliable operations, and the need to balance critical safety initiatives, RAA also encouraged FAA to publish the First Officers Qualifications (FOQ) new rule. “Safety experts underline the importance of structured training programs, and the best and safest path to becoming an airline pilot is through rigorous, multi-dimensional professional and academic trainingone based on quality versus quantity,” said Cohen.  “Safety requires consistency and certainty, and therefore airlines and all stakeholders need an expedited FOQ rulemaking,” he added.

To the RAA, one need only look at the recent accident record of U.S. Part 121 carriers for evidence of the industry’s “dedication” to safety.  In fact, since a Colgan Air Bombardier Q400 crashed on approach to Buffalo almost three years ago, no one has died in a Part 121 airliner accident in the U.S. However, one can fairly debate whether or not the RAA’s efforts over the past few years to answer former FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt’s “Call to Action” might have come too late. Of course, the RAA argues it has always put safety first, but it can’t deny the Colgan crash marked the culmination of a six-year period during which regionals accounted for five of the six fatal accidents involving FAR Part 121 operations.

Unfortunately, the so-called One Level of Safety rule, which in 1997 mandated that all Part 135 commuter airlines flying airplanes carrying 10 or more passenger seats meet Part 121 standards, couldn’t force regional airlines to pay their pilots a living wage and work under conditions that promoted enough rest.

Maybe the new FAA mandate will force a change in culture that for too long has failed to sufficiently discourage the kind of irresponsible behavior sometimes exhibited by underpaid, overworked flight crew. The traveling public deserves at least that much.

FILED UNDER: 
Share this...

Comments

No Avatar
Pete Buffington
on January 18, 2012 - 2:45pm

Very nicely written and your points are all valid. I've been trying to bring to attention the dire working conditions and horrendous pay for starting airline pilots for years. Let's hope the basic principles of economics apply - supply vs demand and the higher flight time requirements for entry level FOs means an increase in attracting well paid pilots. I gave up the airline career to go make 6 times the starting wage in an IT job, and I get to fly as much, and when I want and sleep in my own bed each night. I feel sorry for the flight crews that literally wait in line for food stamps in order to put food on the table for their families. But fellas, don't wear your uniforms in collecting your welfare benefits, your airline will fire you for portraying the company "in bad light". It's a fact.

Pete
Best Selling Author - "Squawk 7700"

No Avatar
Trevor
on December 12, 2012 - 1:21pm

Spot on- a local paper did story of a pilot who flew for a 'certain regional " based in Phoenix AZ s who showed up in full regalia to get his stamps.. boy was company p---d!

After 3800 right seat hrs still make under $30,000.00 for bidding min sched; I will not risk my tickets by busting my a-- and pray every night that budding airline pilots instead get a cfi and teach part time instead and pursue another full time line of work teaching is fun and rewarding and if you're good can snag private candidates on your own. To raise a family and pay bills will not happen at the regional level . I regret my decision in deciding to fly at the regional level every time I get my check even though my ceo tells us "our hard work is appreciated".

No Avatar
matt
on December 14, 2012 - 2:19pm

As long as companies get hundreds of resumes when advertising for pilot positions there is no shortage. As long as regional FO's are still paid sub-$20,000 a year there is no shortage. We have one possibly two generations of pilots to go before any possible shortage in the US. There never has been, is not now, nor never will be a shortage of pilots in the US, the only shortage is of pilots who are willing to work for nothing.

Please Register

In order to leave comments you will now need to be a registered user. This change in policy is to protect our site from an increased number of spam comments. Additionally, in the near future you will be able to better manage your AIN subscriptions via this registration system. If you already have an account, click here to log in. Otherwise, click here to register.

 
X