QUICK SEARCH:
 
Latest News
Aviation International News
Airshow & Convention News
AIN Defense Perspective
AIN Air Transport Perspective
Business Jet Traveler
AINalerts
AINmxReports
AINtv
AIN Blogs


SUBSCRIBE NOW...

SPECIAL REPORTS

Bizav Web Directory
Visit our directory of manufacturers, suppliers and service providers

Issue Archives
Search through years of
AIN past issues


CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Search through the latest
events and conferences



REPRINTS

RSS Feed



Bill seeks to limit TSA’s SD authority

A bipartisan group of congressmen has introduced a bill that would modify the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) authority to issue security directives (SD) without notice or public input.

H.R.3678 would amend the U.S. Code so that the TSA could not issue an SD immediately. Instead, the agency would need to submit the SD to the Transportation Security Oversight Board “to determine if the regulation or security directive is needed to respond to an imminent threat of finite duration.”

When the TSA issued a security directive in December requiring pilots based at airline-served airports to undergo a security threat assessment and receive a security badge to continue to have unescorted access to their airports, House lawmakers agreed with assertions from the general aviation community that the TSA has been using security directives to bypass a rulemaking process that should solicit comments from affected parties.

Legislators added an amendment to the TSA Authorization Act (H.R.2200) that clarified the conditions under which the agency would be authorized to issue SDs, limiting the practice to situations involving imminent threat and finite duration. Otherwise, the TSA had to work within the framework of the Administrative Procedures Act when issuing new proposals. H.R.2200 passed the House but is awaiting Senate consideration.

Meanwhile, H.R.3678, now a freestanding bill, would require the TSA to follow established standards when issuing public notice for regulations and security directives, and would require the agency to conduct a formal rulemaking process for any emergency regulation or security directive in place for more than 180 days.

If the bill were enacted into law, the SD that requires badging of GA pilots at commercial-service airports would have to go through the rulemaking process, giving pilots the opportunity to comment and influence changes to the directive. 

Back

Share This Article With Others

Tweet thisDigg thisRedditBookmark on deliciousStumble thisShare on FacebookFave on Technorati

Related Articles

NextGen To Fuel Growth in Air Travel, FAA Says
March 09, 2010

The FAA said in its annual aviation forecast this morning that key airspace safety and modernization efforts contained in the Next Generation...

 
Operators question value of LOAs for RVSM operations
February 01, 2010

Now that reduced vertical separation minimums (RVSM) operations have been running smoothly in the U.S. since Jan. 5, 2005, business jet...

 
Hersman Blasts FAA over Runway Incursion Dithering
December 04, 2009

“There will be some truth-telling,” declared new NTSB chair Deborah Hersman on Tuesday as she began her opening address at the FAA International...

 
Pilot Fatigue Rules Delayed Until New Year
December 04, 2009

The FAA has acknowledged that new rules governing fatigue for Part 121 pilots are still a work in progress, despite the labors of the flight-...

 
Comments on 145 Security Proposal Mostly Negative
December 02, 2009

After the Transportation Security Administration issued a notice of proposed rulemaking for FAA-certified Part 145 repair station security on...