SEARCH:
 
News
Aviation International News
Airshow & Convention News
AIN Defense Perspective
Business Jet Traveler
AINalerts
AINmxReports
AINtv

Look inside Current Issue

SUBSCRIBE NOW...

SPECIAL REPORTS

Bizav Web Directory
Visit our directory of manufacturers, suppliers and service providers

Issue Archives
Search through years of
AIN past issues


CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Search through the latest
events and conferences



REPRINTS

RSS Feed



TEB crash prompts NTSB safety recommendation

The NTSB issued safety recommendations A-08-48 and -49 on July 17 warning that pilots may decide to abort takeoffs in Bombardier Challengers if the pilots mistakenly set the pitch trim too far forward, even though the aircraft will lift off at a speed above V2 in that configuration.

When it investigated the Feb. 2, 2005, Challenger 600 aborted takeoff accident at Teterboro (N.J.) Airport, the Safety Board found that “in the mistrim scenario, with the [center of gravity] at the most forward limit and with the horizontal stabilizer at the nose-down limit of the takeoff green band, the airplane did not rotate, even with full nose-up elevator control, until it was significantly above the nominal rotation speed (V2).”

The NTSB found the cause of the accident to be the fact that the Challenger “had a center of gravity that was significantly forward of the airplane’s forward limit, which severely degraded the airplane’s ability to rotate” and that “neither pilot used the available weight and balance information appropriately.”

The NTSB said that pilots in this type of mistrim scenario may elect to abort the takeoff at a high speed because they believe the airplane won’t fly. “A delay of this length in the most adverse trim condition is an excessive delay that constitutes an ‘unsafe flight characteristic,’” the NTSB claimed, although certification regulations do not “state explicitly that an excessive delay in rotation during the mistrim is an ‘unsafe flight characteristic’ to be evaluated during certification testing.”

The Safety Board recommends that the FAA revise certification advisory material to address mistrim-takeoff rotation delays and that Challenger operators “provide training to their pilots that emphasizes the importance of the proper takeoff stabilizer trim setting.”

The NTSB recommended that Transport Canada encourage Bombardier to revise its Challenger quick reference handbook (QRH) to include details on setting stabilizer trim, which are not currently in the handbook. However, FlightSafety International publishes the QRH.

The NTSB did not say whether it has simulator tested forward cg/full forward trim configurations in any other jet types.

Back

Share This Article With Others

del.icio.us digg.com netscape Reddit stumbleupon.com Technorati

Related Articles

Captain Used Tiller in Effort To Recover During 737 Takeoff Crash
January 08, 2009

A preliminary report issued by the NTSB yesterday on the facts surrounding the December 20 accident of a Continental Airlines Boeing 737-500 at...

 
PHI S-76 Down In Louisiana
January 06, 2009

Six of seven passengers and both pilots died when a two-year-old Sikorsky S-76C++ crashed into a swamp just seven minutes after takeoff from...

 
Fuel Exhaustion Cited in Citation II Crash
January 06, 2009

A Cessna Citation II that ran out of fuel and landed gear-up early Sunday morning at Wilmington (N.C.) International Airport sustained...

 
Breath Away from Heaven 3:36 Cloud Nine (2004 Remastered) George Harrison 10/9/07 11:31 AM
January 01, 2009

Brazil’s Cenipa accident investigation bureau has issued its report on the September 2006 midair over the Amazon, along with an NTSB dissent....

 
Burst tire prompts Global mods
January 01, 2009

The UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) has issued four safety recommendations in response to an incident in which a burst tire on a...