QUICK SEARCH:
 
News
Aviation International News
Airshow & Convention News
AIN Defense Perspective
AIN Air Transport Perspective
Business Jet Traveler
AINalerts
AINmxReports
AINtv
AIN Blogs

Look inside Current Issue

SUBSCRIBE NOW...

SPECIAL REPORTS

Bizav Web Directory
Visit our directory of manufacturers, suppliers and service providers

Issue Archives
Search through years of
AIN past issues


CALENDAR OF EVENTS
Search through the latest
events and conferences



REPRINTS

RSS Feed



Thousands of faulty fan blades found in CF34s

The NTSB last month sent recommendations to the FAA and Transport Canada to address a safety concern raised by two engine failures on Bombardier CRJ200s. The Board has determined that a flaw during the manufacturing process for fan blades led to the failure of the GE CF34-3B1 turbofans, and it wants procedures established to remove the suspect blades before another incident occurs.

In both cases–a July 27, 2006, engine failure on an Air Nostrum CRJ shortly after takeoff from Barcelona, Spain, and a May 24, 2007, engine failure on an Atlantic Southeast Airlines CRJ while in cruise flight from Syracuse to Atlanta–a fan blade fractured, causing a loud bang, severe vibration and in one case an engine fire. Both flight crews declared emergencies and landed safely with no injuries.

Examination of the blades showed that they failed due to a material defect introduced during the manufacturing process. The manufacturer–Mexico’s Teleflex Aerospace Manufacturing Group–has produced more than 28,000 of the blades.
“We are issuing this recommendation because we consider the safety risk associated with this condition to be unacceptably high,” said NTSB chairman Mark Rosenker in a statement.

The ASA fan blade failed after 4,717 cycles and 5,845 hours.

The Board issued six recommendations to the FAA, including that it require GE Aviation to define a reasonable maximum time frame below 4,717 cycles and to replace all Teleflex blades that have reached that threshold. It also recommended that the FAA require GE to include further testing during the manufacturing process, and to modify the design of the CF34-1 and -3 engines to ensure that in the event a blade does break, the resulting engine vibration does not cause a fire.

Meanwhile, the Board has asked Transport Canada to require Bombardier to
redesign the retention feature of the CRJ 100/-200 engine throttle gearbox to ensure that it can withstand the loads generated by a fan blade separation or similar event.

Back

Share This Article With Others

Tweet thisDigg thisRedditBookmark on deliciousStumble thisShare on FacebookFave on Technorati

Related Articles

Talk of Narrowbody Re-engine Prospects Intensifies
October 30, 2009

Now that Boeing and Airbus have made clear their lack of interest in introducing all-new narrowbody models before 2020, talk of any response by...

Single News Page
 
NTSB Investigates Northwest Airlines Overflight
October 22, 2009

The NTSB has launched an investigation into an incident yesterday in which a Northwest Airlines Airbus A320 overflew its...

 
Goodrich, Rolls-Royce Team on Lean Tech, A350XWB Nozzles
October 15, 2009

Goodrich Corp. has signed a research agreement with Rolls-Royce to develop the new fuel nozzles for “lean burn” combustion technology systems...

 
Japan Joins Green Asia and Pacific Aviation Partnership
October 13, 2009

Japan has become the latest partner in the Asia and Pacific Initiative to Reduce Emissions (Aspire), joining the FAA, Airservices Australia and...

 
Mitsubishi keeps MRJ on course; critical design review under way
June 18, 2009

Development of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation’s MRJ regional jet continues on schedule, as some 800 engineers, designers and subcontractors in...